History of Violence. Based on Histoire de la violence by Edouard Louis.
Directed by Thomas Ostermeier. Director Thomas Ostermeier. Collaboration Director David Stoehr. Set and costume design. Nina Wetzel. Composer Nils Ostendorf. Video Sebastian Dupouey. Dramaturg Florian Borchmeyer. Lighting designer. Michael Wetzel. Collaboration choreography Johanna Lemke. Coproduction with Theatre de la Ville ParisTheatre National Wallonie-Bruxelle and St Ann’s Warehouse Brooklyn. The Dunstan Playhouse. Adelaide Festival Centre. Adelaide Festival. February 7 – March 2 2026.
Cast: Christoph Gawenda. Laurenz Lufenberg. Renato Schuch. Alina Stiegler. Thomas Witte (Musician)
Reviewed by Peter Wilkins
![]() |
Laurenz Lufenberg as the policeman. Christoph Gawenda as Edouard. Renato Schuch as Reda in Histoire de la violence |
Audiences who remember Thomas Ostermeier’s politically charged production of Who Killed My Father (Qui a tue mon pere?) at the 2024 Adelaide Festival may have some idea of what to expect from his production based on Edouard Louis’s autobiographical novel Histoire de la violence. In the tradition of Shaubuhne Berlin Histoire de la violence is a shocking and compelling account of the brutal sexual assault of Louis by a stranger he met while returning home to his Paris apartment on Christmas Eve. What unfolds are a series of reenactments of the events from the flirtation on the street to the invitation to Edouard’s apartment, sex between them and a violent outburst when Edouard accuses the Algerian Reda of robbery.
![]() |
| Christoph Gawenda and Alina Stiegler as Clara in Histoire de la violence |
Ostermeir is forensically clinical in his exploration of the themes of violence and identity. His is a bare bones investigation of the incident in an attempt to reach the truth. The play opens with Edouard Louis (Christoph Gawenda) seated at the back of the stage as a team of forensic investigators enter to mark out the scene for evidence and fingerprints. On the screen at the rear a video of a naked man writhes on the floor. Edouard moves forward to a microphone and a raw and urgent retelling of the experience bursts forth, urgent, breathless and echoing with terror. Percussionist Thomas Witte accompanies the tense recounting of the horror of the scene.
![]() |
| Edouard Gawenda and Renato Schuch as Reda in Histoire de la violence |
The account is gripping, forecasting the violence that is about to erupt as Reda (Renato Schuch} twists the scarf about Edouard’s throat in an act of fury. And yet there are no clear answers to the conundrum. How does one explain the blood that is on the bed and the floor? Has Reda carried out his threat of murder? Does he strangle Edouard or does he shoot him) Or neither? We are left with a veil of ambiguity which clouds reality. Is Eduard’s account to his sister Clara (Alina Stiegler) an accurate retelling of the sequence of events? Is Clara’s retelling to her husband (Laurenz Lufenberg) a distortion? The characters become witnesses to the event and incidentally interpreters of truth. Clara’s view of the story is informed by her attitude towards her homosexual brother. The police are dictated to by procedure and prejudice towards North Africans. Cara and Eduoard are influenced by the depressed mother, forced to work in a menial and punishing job. Reda finds justification in the criminal past of his father and grandfather. The doctor’s disinterest is expressed in her disregard for Edouard’s condition as she finishes her hand of solitaire. The truth changes as each character creates their own reality.
![]() |
| Renato Schuch as Reda in Histoire de la violence |
Ostermeier is the master of alienation or what Brecht termed das Verfremdungseffekt. The direction is sharply anatomical and analytical. The characters speak through microphones at times to tell their account or heighten the drama of the moment. Video is used to embellish the visceral effect of the sexual intimacy and the escalating violence. At times the actors break into a dance routine as a mockery of the seriousness of the situation. There is comical pathos in the caricature of the mother or the indifference of Clara’s boring husband. In Ostermeier’s production the history of any violence is a complex account of many truths, depending on the character and motives of the teller. It is what gives this production power. There is not a murmer in the audience, gripped by the complexity of their own perspective. What is the truth and how can we change it? We are left with the force of our imagination to alter reality which is what Edouard does whether speaking to his sister, the police or the hospital staff or the audience.
Photos by Arno Declair









