Showing posts with label David Manley. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Manley. Show all posts

Sunday, May 10, 2026

Between What Remains

Visual Arts Exhibition Review | Brian Rope

Between What Remains | Hilary Wardhaugh and David Manley

Belconnen Arts Centre |  27 March – 17 May 2026

The 2024 Canberra City News Artist of the Year, Hilary Wardhaugh, has again produced a wonderful collection of artworks – this time for a joint exhibition with a friend from their teenage years in Belconnen. Their surroundings influenced the visual elements they both would later use to convey their ideas and responses to the places they experienced as artists. 

David Manley has also contributed great imagery for this exhibition. His artworks often are constructed pieces – architectural models and dioramas. The two artists complement each other.

Between What Remains reflects on the lives of the two artists and their shared artistic vision. They have come together in this exhibition to present conceptually aligned bodies of work.

Manley photographically explores architectural models and historical sites that have been marked by violence. The profound influence past events and experiences have on the present and future of individuals and societies, the overwhelming nature of media in our lives today, and the rapid, decisive and forceful application of actions underpin his constructed trauma-scapes. In those quiet, speculative spaces, memories linger and collapse into the present.

Wardhaugh’s series The Disconnect also inhabits the territory of temporal rupture, but from a post-documentary urban landscape perspective. Exploring disconnection and the categorisation of the natural world in our urban landscapes, the work uses visual portrayals to contemplate puzzling things.

Curator Alexander Boynes wonderful essay in the catalogue suggests this reunion of the two artists in a renewed dialogue is shaped by their shared beginnings in Belconnen. He tells us that the developed photography practices of both artists have led to them viewing landscapes and architecture as sites of memory, rupture and return not simply as subjects.

All 21 works draw us in to stand before them, first looking closely at the elements contained in them, then thinking about the messages they are intended to convey. Messages about ecological forces, climate change, impacts on biodiversity, the consequences of human presence, the traumatic impacts, and their own perceptions and views about our responsibilities in our world.

Manley’s High Rise shows us a huge concrete edifice improbably hovering high over the surface below. We wonder how it could possibly have moved into that position, apparently weightless despite its size and composition. How it could be so light as to float there? 

High Rise, 2023. 1000mm x 1000mm. Framed pigment print – David Manley

Post-Traumatic Urbanist #2 Shows me a complex structure which might have been part of a long-gone urban settlement in what is now a barren landscape. Manley himself and others viewing the image may see something quite different.

Post-traumatic Urbanist #2, 2017. 500mm x 500mm. Framed pigment print – David Manley

Zoomorphic Cement Structure is another delightful piece. Seen from a distance it seemed to me that somehow a large cement block had moved right heading away from its purpose as a key support for the block above. Moving closer revealed I was wrong. A little research since has told me that zoomorphic architecture refers to the design and construction of buildings inspired by the forms and characteristics of animals. It embraces fluidity, dynamism, and a connection to nature. Perhaps my first interpretation resulted from fluidity.

Zoomorphic Cement Structure, 2013, 1250mm x 1000mm. Framed pigment print – David Manley

Wardhaugh’s pieces are diverse, but also complementary. Landscapes reveal terrains that have been significantly impacted by environmental stress and by decisions made, or not made, by those responsible for particular locations. In The Life of a roadside bush, the bush is a lone piece of nature in urban Queanbeyan’s concrete surroundings.

The Life of a roadside bush, 2025. 850mm x 1200mm. Framed pigment print – Hilary Wardhaugh

Danger! Nature is another most interesting piece. I invite you to look closely and interpret what you see for yourself. What are we looking at? Is it all real? Was the yellow vertical structure which neatly divides the image in two actually there in that landscape?

Danger! Nature, 2014. 850mm x 1200mm. Framed pigment print – Hilary Wardhaugh

Coercively Controlled confronts us with a view of trees being forced to grow as someone has determined they should, rather than allowing nature to take its course.

Coercively Controlled, 2025. 850mm x 1200mm. Framed pigment print – Hilary Wardhaugh

Succulent and Potty is another piece that demands our investigation. It is not simply a potted plant with thick, water-storing leaves sitting atop an interesting structure. Behind it is what might be a tall building under construction covered with translucent material.

Succulent and Potty, 2023. 850mm x 1200mm. Framed pigment print – Hilary Wardhaugh

Both artists have effectively used the cathartic power of image-making in a world marked by the human cost of disconnection, ambivalence and disruption.

This review is also available on the author's blog. A shorter review has also been published in Canberra City News.

Wednesday, October 9, 2024

The Spectral Lens

Photography Review | Brian Rope

The Spectral Lens | Carolyn Craig, Damian Dillon, Clare Humphries, Roy Lee, David Manley & Justine Roche

Photo Access | 12 September – 12 October 2024

Promotional material for this exhibition, The Spectral Lens, refers to strategies of ‘hauntology’ and the spectre. I was familiar with ‘spectre’ referring to ghosts and haunting, but what was hauntology I asked myself. Some research revealed “the philosophical concept of Hauntology (a portmanteau of haunting and ontology, also spectral studies, spectralities or the spectral turn) is a range of ideas referring to the return or persistence of elements from the social or cultural past, as in the manner of a ghost. ……. first introduced by French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his 1993 book Spectres of Marx. …. since been invoked in fields such as visual arts…..” So there you have it (if you were also wondering).

Curator (and exhibitor) Carolyn Craig has written a substantial essay for the exhibition catalogue, which refers to an era of multi-perspectival loss (and gain) and speaks about our bodies attempting to find a stable horizon by ingesting an overconsumption of belief via the image. We read that  “the viewfinder moves into a fetishist past aligned with an almost renaissance nostalgia – while the JPEG empire consumes the single lens apparatus in an overload and discharge of normative cultural production.”

Having previously read the promotional material and the catalogue, I wondered what I was going to see – indeed whether I would even begin to understand the artworks. The answer is, as so often the case, that I will need more time to think about the imagery whilst also re-reading all the catalogue. In the meantime, I need to write some words of my own here about the exhibits.

The first pieces seen as I entered were those of Craig titled Who Gets the Rose - UV prints on Perspex, mounted on welded steel frames, with videos of slow-moving clouds looping in screens on the floor below.

Who Gets the Rose, 2023 © Carolyn Craig (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Next, Justine Roche is showing 24 Hours (although a bio in the catalogue also refers to her series Dark Eden), comprising 24 wet plate collodions on aluminium, one on a smallish wall with the others in a long row on the adjoining long wall. They are each 12.7 x 15.2 cm, so need close inspection to see the imagery. Some are quite beautiful, whilst others are so dark as to hide their contents from my eyes.

24 hours, 2020 © Justine Roche (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Damian Dillon contributes 2 C-type prints of the same subject in one acrylic mount and large UV prints on white steel supported by plastic crates. Roy Lee has 2 archival inkjet prints. Clare Humphries contribution is one framed archival inkjet print. Of these various works, I was particularly impressed by Lee’s. His glorious works held my attention and drew me back to explore their detail.

Contemporary ruin #4, 2024 © Damian Dillon (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

History of Sky, 2022 © Roy Lee (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

David Manley provides something quite different. One of his works, appropriately titled Brute, is created from cardboard, cement and brick. Two are excellent inkjet prints. His final exhibit is a single channel video titled Plume, projected low down on a gallery wall, seemingly upside down – a plume of reddish dust/smoke was falling downwards whilst I was watching part of its 16:57 minutes.

Far left: Brute, 2023 © David Manley

Rear left: Plume, 2017 (single channel video) © David Manley

Top right: Ekleipsis Apertura, 2024 © Clare Humphries

(Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Each of these six artists is highly qualified and has an impressive CV. They have a variety of tertiary qualifications, exhibit regularly – sometimes overseas, and have achieved successes in various Prizes. They frequently exhibit together as a group. Some work in a number of different media. Some have been published in journals and books. Others are represented in public collections. And, as Craig writes in her catalogue essay, “each artist contributes to a gathering of potential ways forward sensing and knowing via affect.”

Yes, it might be a challenging exhibition (and catalogue), but we all need to be challenged to grow as art lovers or art makers. So, I need to stop here and return to thinking about these works and re-reading the catalogue.


This review is also available on the author's blog here.