Showing posts with label Carolyn Craig. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Carolyn Craig. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 30, 2025

Mullins Conceptual Photography Prize (MCPP) 2025

Photography Review | Brian Rope

Mullins Conceptual Photography Prize (MCPP) 2025 | Various artists

Muswellbrook Regional Arts Centre (MRAC) | 14 August – 11 October 2025

As always, it is somewhat difficult to review an exhibition where the artworks are from numerous artists, and the only connection is that they have been selected as finalists in a competition. So, I’ll follow my practice of discussing just a selection of the exhibits, starting with the adjudicator, Antares Wells, awarded pieces.

The winner of this year’s $30,000 is a woman wearing a choker is walking in a crowd, 2024, an inkjet print on cotton rag, inkjet print on clear film 80.5 x 59.4 cm by Johanna Ng. It will be acquired and join all previous MCPP winners in MRAC’s permanent collection of post-war contemporary paintings, ceramic and photography. The prizemoney amount puts this event amongst the major Australian photographic contests.

The work traces what the artist describes as “the parallel erasure of Asian identities in computer vision and network television.” She captured screenshots of Asian bodies then photographed them into new compositions. In this winning image, an Asian woman becomes “a woman” and “a woman” conjures the image of a white one. 

Johanna Ng - a woman wearing a choker is walking in a crowd, 2024

Wells also named two Highly Commended works. They were Miho Watanabe’s Awareness of Between-ness: A Day After My Father’s Departure – Self-Portrait in His Room on His Chair, 2025, and Mungo Howard’s Studio Window, 2025. Watanabe’s artwork is delightful – a self-portrait, taken the day after his father died. Transferred onto silk using a phototransfer technique, the image will gradually fade, mirroring how memory dissolves with time and evoking the quiet passage between presence and absence. I hope I’ll have an opportunity to view this artwork again when that fading has advanced significantly. 

Miho Watanabe - Awareness of Between-ness: A Day After My Father’s Departure – Self-Portrait in His Room on His Chair, 2025

Mungo Howard - Studio Window, 2025

Let me now comment on just a few of the other finalist works in the exhibition. Hilary Wardhaugh is amongst them for the second year running; this time with her work Dad’s Last Swim, 2024.

The artist statement tells us that before scattering her dad’s ashes into the waves at his favourite beach she made a lumen 'portrait' of him using the ashes. She then washed the paper in the sea, leaving sand where his ashes had lain. Wardhaugh always remembers “Dad being sandy and salty at the beach after swimming.” I have no doubt her family will enjoy this clever artwork about Dad for all time. 

Hilary Wardhaugh - Dad's Last Swim, 2024

I must mention Angus Brown’s Torqued Image Object 1, 2024. How many of us who print our images have mounted them on a rolled aluminium sheet? I certainly haven’t. Brown has done that with this pearl-finished silver gelatin print. He tells us that “In an effort to stretch the conventions of image-making outside the flat pictorial plane, I employ the operations of sculpture into the field of photography……. Maintaining the logic of image making, whilst speaking the language of sculpture, these blended outcomes have come to be known as ‘image-object’.”

Angus Brown - Torqued Image Object 1, 2024

There are many other interesting artworks in this exhibition, including Carolyn Craig’s Re/mediate, 2024, which is screen-printed charcoal dust on paper. And Tamara Voninski’s Chemo Decay: Sun Ritual, 2025, a photographic lightbox. She exposed images from her chemotherapy-induced dreams to the same chemo cancer drugs that drip into her veins during treatment.

Carolyn Craig - Re/mediate, 2024
 
Tamara Voninski - Chemo Decay: Sun Ritual, 2025

When reviewing the 2024 MCPP, I said that I considered it to be the best one yet overall. This 2025 exhibition is considerably better again.

All the selected finalists and their accompanying artist statements can be seen in a virtual gallery here. However, it would be a much better experience to visit the MRAC and see the finished artworks up close if you possibly can do so.

A longer review is available on the author's blog here and in the December 25 issue of The Printer here.

Wednesday, October 9, 2024

The Spectral Lens

Photography Review | Brian Rope

The Spectral Lens | Carolyn Craig, Damian Dillon, Clare Humphries, Roy Lee, David Manley & Justine Roche

Photo Access | 12 September – 12 October 2024

Promotional material for this exhibition, The Spectral Lens, refers to strategies of ‘hauntology’ and the spectre. I was familiar with ‘spectre’ referring to ghosts and haunting, but what was hauntology I asked myself. Some research revealed “the philosophical concept of Hauntology (a portmanteau of haunting and ontology, also spectral studies, spectralities or the spectral turn) is a range of ideas referring to the return or persistence of elements from the social or cultural past, as in the manner of a ghost. ……. first introduced by French philosopher Jacques Derrida in his 1993 book Spectres of Marx. …. since been invoked in fields such as visual arts…..” So there you have it (if you were also wondering).

Curator (and exhibitor) Carolyn Craig has written a substantial essay for the exhibition catalogue, which refers to an era of multi-perspectival loss (and gain) and speaks about our bodies attempting to find a stable horizon by ingesting an overconsumption of belief via the image. We read that  “the viewfinder moves into a fetishist past aligned with an almost renaissance nostalgia – while the JPEG empire consumes the single lens apparatus in an overload and discharge of normative cultural production.”

Having previously read the promotional material and the catalogue, I wondered what I was going to see – indeed whether I would even begin to understand the artworks. The answer is, as so often the case, that I will need more time to think about the imagery whilst also re-reading all the catalogue. In the meantime, I need to write some words of my own here about the exhibits.

The first pieces seen as I entered were those of Craig titled Who Gets the Rose - UV prints on Perspex, mounted on welded steel frames, with videos of slow-moving clouds looping in screens on the floor below.

Who Gets the Rose, 2023 © Carolyn Craig (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Next, Justine Roche is showing 24 Hours (although a bio in the catalogue also refers to her series Dark Eden), comprising 24 wet plate collodions on aluminium, one on a smallish wall with the others in a long row on the adjoining long wall. They are each 12.7 x 15.2 cm, so need close inspection to see the imagery. Some are quite beautiful, whilst others are so dark as to hide their contents from my eyes.

24 hours, 2020 © Justine Roche (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Damian Dillon contributes 2 C-type prints of the same subject in one acrylic mount and large UV prints on white steel supported by plastic crates. Roy Lee has 2 archival inkjet prints. Clare Humphries contribution is one framed archival inkjet print. Of these various works, I was particularly impressed by Lee’s. His glorious works held my attention and drew me back to explore their detail.

Contemporary ruin #4, 2024 © Damian Dillon (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

History of Sky, 2022 © Roy Lee (Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

David Manley provides something quite different. One of his works, appropriately titled Brute, is created from cardboard, cement and brick. Two are excellent inkjet prints. His final exhibit is a single channel video titled Plume, projected low down on a gallery wall, seemingly upside down – a plume of reddish dust/smoke was falling downwards whilst I was watching part of its 16:57 minutes.

Far left: Brute, 2023 © David Manley

Rear left: Plume, 2017 (single channel video) © David Manley

Top right: Ekleipsis Apertura, 2024 © Clare Humphries

(Installation photo by Eunie Kim)

Each of these six artists is highly qualified and has an impressive CV. They have a variety of tertiary qualifications, exhibit regularly – sometimes overseas, and have achieved successes in various Prizes. They frequently exhibit together as a group. Some work in a number of different media. Some have been published in journals and books. Others are represented in public collections. And, as Craig writes in her catalogue essay, “each artist contributes to a gathering of potential ways forward sensing and knowing via affect.”

Yes, it might be a challenging exhibition (and catalogue), but we all need to be challenged to grow as art lovers or art makers. So, I need to stop here and return to thinking about these works and re-reading the catalogue.


This review is also available on the author's blog here.